Food Rules

The "Rules" in this book were pretty common sense (especially for those of us familiar with the Word of Wisdom). There were some quite interesting points in the rules though. A good hour read. It gave me a desire to improve my eating habits. The assignment was as follows:

1)Complete the reading assignment for the book Food Rules – An Eater’s Manual: Entire book.

2)Consider the supporting questions posted on Blackboard.

1.How can you align Pollan's basic premis - "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." with current world populations growth patterns?

2.How do current global issues related to food availability and nutritional quality relate to Doctrine and Covenants 89?

3)Your task is to write a two-page, double-spaced, typed essay addressing the question:

Summarize some of the key economic, agricultural, and ecological implications associated with large scale implementation of Michael Pollan’s advice to “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.”

Food Rules Exploration Topic

Societies, throughout the history of the world, have changed and morphed to become what they are today. In the book “Food Rules,” the author, Mr. Pollan, suggests “food cultures are embedded in societies and economies and ecologies” (89). As our society changes, our food culture follows suit. The Lord issues us this warning about our food culture: “In consequence of evils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days, I have warned you, and forewarn you, by giving unto you this word of wisdom by revelation” (Doctrine and Covenants 89:4). Let it not be suggested that the entire food industry is designed by the evil one, however, it is important to note that the motivator behind much of where and how we get our food is not altogether to get the most healthy things into our bodies. Mr. Pollan's answer to this is “Eat Food. Not too much. Mostly Plants” (xv). Considering where our world is concerning food, a large scale implementation of this concept would have dramatic effects economically, agriculturally, and ecologically.

Currently, a “Western diet” consists of “lots of processed foods and meat, lots of added fat and sugar, lots of refined grains, lots of everything except vegtables, fruits, and whole grains” (Michael Pollan, xii). Historically, people with this kind of diet commonly suffer from “so-called Western diseases: obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.” (Pollan, xii). There couldn't be a more convincing case that this type of diet is not good for the body. To preserve health in our diet, there needs to be a change.

If a change, what kind? Mr. Pollan outlines sixty-four eating “rules” that he believes are the change we need. These rules can be separated into three categories (stated earlier): “Eat Food. Not too much. Mostly plants” (xv). Let us consider what this concept is. Essentially, the concept “eat food” refers to the difference between “real food” and processed foods. “Not too much” deals with our relationship to food. The conceptual phrase itself is self-explanatory, simply don't over eat. And thirdly, “Mostly plants” gives us a guideline of proportions to the types of food that is most healthy for us.

If we were to implement these concepts, and change from our diet linked to diseases to a diet linked to healthy life (Pollan, xiii), there would be some major ramifications surrounding our current economical, agricultural, and ecological status. There are over seventeen thousand new products on the shelves at groceries stores every year (Pollan, 5). This alone should show us some of the enormous affect a change would present. That's dietary scientists, food processing factory workers, and many more, who would be negatively affected if people chose to stop buying their products. Agriculturally, it would be a huge blessing, at least those who don't sell to large food processing companies. Moving from buying factory processed “food” to right-off-the-stem food would dramatically increase the demand for agricultural growth. As far as ecology is concerned, it seems that the implications of change within that realm would be too numerous to cover. With the rise in demand of “real food,” more crops would be planted and less factories would emit pollution. Focusing on the rule 24 which states “eating what stands on one leg [mushrooms and plant foods] is better than eating what stands on two legs [fowl], which is better than eating what stands on four legs [cows, pigs, and other mammals]” (Pollan, 55) would be a big change from the enormous amounts of meat we eat, which would increase the mortality rate of the animals we currently consume. The affects of this change would go on and on!

The revealed truths of our health code, referred to as the “Word of Wisdom” recorded in the Doctrine and Covenants, section 89, are uniquely connected with these concepts. As science improves, it seems to draw closer and closer to confirming what the Lord has revealed through the ages. The Word of Wisdom encourages rule 24 discussed earlier, along with the majority of the other rules (with the strong exception of rule number 43, which encourages the consumption of wine at dinner).

To sum things up, the economical, agricultural, and ecological implications of a large scale implementation of Michael Pollan's advise to “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants” would be both positive and negative on different levels, for different individuals. Though study of health science is still a relatively new science (Pollan, xi), it is wise to give it some credence. However, we can trust that the Lord knew what he was doing when he put the world together and eat the natural things of this world.